Trump's lawyers say a recent Supreme Court decision​ on presidential immunity​ means certain evidence and testimony should not have been allowed in his trial.

His lawyers argue that a Supreme Court decision confirmed that prosecutors should have been precluded from introducing some evidence they said constituted official presidential acts.

Former President Trump on Monday asked his hush money judge to set aside the recent guilty verdict after the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling, according to a person familiar with the matter. The Supreme Court provided former presidents with a broad shield against criminal prosecution,