News
President Donald Trump seeks a 93% funding cut to a quasi-federal government agency responsible for promoting economic ...
Sen. Mike Lee’s public lands sell-off rider, meant to be part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” is officially dead. But using ...
As local flood victims wait for movement from Washington, D.C., on federal assistance, Delegate Shawn Fluharty faults the West Virginia Legislature for not being proactive and establishing a flood ...
In the latest change to federal land management, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has announced its intention to get rid of ...
President Donald Trump’s administration has proposed several changes that would affect the struggling U.S. coal industry.
The West Virginia Coal Association is praising the passage of the massive budget bill passed by Congress on Thursday, however ...
Some fast growing cities think access to federal lands could be a boon. Others worry the sale would be a giveaway to developers and mining companies.
Once protections for federally owned lands are removed, public access and environmental safeguards vanish too, Backcountry Hunters & Anglers’ Garrett Robinson writes in a guest column.
House Republicans added a provision to their tax cut package authorizing sales of thousands of acres of public lands in Nevada and Utah, prompting outrage from Democrats and environmentalists.
A failed lawsuit to wrest control The wholesale transfer of federal lands to local or private entities is something many western conservatives have long sought.
The provision is part of a sweeping tax cut package and mirrors the Trump administration’s view of most public lands as an asset to be used, not set aside for preservation.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results