Even the folks behind generative AI writing are embarrassed at how bad it is, but Grammarly ripping off the voices of well-known modern writers is indicative of a much larger problem. Apparently, ...

Grammarly said it will rethink the tool after criticism that it used real experts—including some who are deceased—without ...

A recently-added feature in Grammarly purports to improve users’ writing with help from the world's great writers and ...

Grammarly infuriated journalists, authors, and academics with its “Expert Review” feature, which impersonated writers — both ...

"Thanks for holding us accountable," a director at the company said.

Now, Grammarly has finally addressed the backlash — but not by apologizing, and not by walking the feature back. For now, it will graciously give us the chance to opt out of something we didn’t know ...

Superhuman has taken its writing assistant Grammarly on quite the merry-go-round ride regarding its approach to AI tools. In August, the company launched a feature called Expert Review that would ...

Grammarly's “Expert Review” feature uses AI to give feedback through the lens of noted writers and scholars—some of whom are no longer living.

Grammarly's AI-powered "Expert Review" promises "writing feedback by subject-matter experts," and if you write about journalism, there's a good chance that includes you.

Marketers can now train AI on brand voice, messaging, and audiences to generate accurate, on-brand content directly ...

I spent $200 and eight hours to build a “to-do list” app, so I could avoid zooming in on a spreadsheet on my phone. I love it but it has limits.

In August 2025, Grammarly—which has since changed the company’s name to Superhuman—launched something called Expert Review.